CiteBar
  • Log in
  • Join

An argument is stronger if it's more specific 85%

Truth rate: 85%
u1727780269122's avatar u1727780046881's avatar u1727780016195's avatar u1727694254554's avatar u1727780260927's avatar u1727694239205's avatar u1727780040402's avatar u1727780256632's avatar u1727779910644's avatar u1727780078568's avatar u1727780324374's avatar cdb4a7eff953773e94d01eafb7ebf8fe's avatar u1727779953932's avatar u1727780299408's avatar u1727780148882's avatar
  • Pros: 3
  • Cons: 0
An argument is stronger if it's more specific

The Power of Precision

Have you ever found yourself in a debate or discussion where someone makes a broad statement, only to have it easily dismissed by others? It's frustrating, isn't it? This phenomenon is more common than you think. The key to winning an argument lies not in being right, but in being specific.

The Problem with Vagueness

When we make general statements or arguments, they are often too broad and lack concrete evidence to support them. This vagueness can lead to confusion and undermine our credibility. Think about it: if you say "this company is bad," what exactly do you mean? Is it the management, the products, the culture? Without specificity, your argument falls flat.

The Benefits of Specificity

On the other hand, when we make specific arguments, they are more convincing and harder to dismiss. Here's why:

  • We provide concrete examples
  • We show a clear understanding of the issue
  • We demonstrate our expertise
  • We give others a clear idea of what needs to change
  • We avoid generalities and assumptions

A Real-Life Example

Let's say you're discussing a new policy at work. Instead of saying "this policy is bad," you could say: "I'm concerned about the impact of this policy on employee morale, specifically the lack of transparency around decision-making processes." This specific argument provides context, shows that you've thought critically about the issue, and gives others a clear idea of what needs to change.

Putting it into Practice

So, how can we apply this principle in our everyday conversations? Here are some tips:

  • When making an argument, try to be as specific as possible.
  • Use concrete examples and data to support your claims.
  • Avoid generalities and assumptions.
  • Show that you've done your research and understand the issue.

Conclusion

In conclusion, specificity is key when it comes to winning arguments. By being precise and providing clear evidence, we can build stronger cases and convince others of our point of view. Remember, it's not about being right; it's about being specific. So next time you find yourself in a debate or discussion, take the time to think critically and make your argument more specific. Your credibility will thank you.


Pros: 3
  • Cons: 0
  • ⬆
Vagueness undermines credibility 86%
Impact:
+100
u1727780347403's avatar
A lack of specificity weakens arguments 59%
Impact:
+92
u1727780020779's avatar
Specific details strengthen the credibility of an argument instantly 38%
Impact:
+92
u1727780299408's avatar

Cons: 0
  • Pros: 3
  • ⬆

Be the first who create Cons!


Refs: 0

Info:
  • Created by: Angela Francisco
  • Created at: Oct. 18, 2024, 6:15 p.m.
  • ID: 13346

Related:
Specific threats elicit stronger reactions than vague ones 79%
79%
u1727780148882's avatar u1727780144470's avatar u1727779923737's avatar u1727694254554's avatar u1727780264632's avatar u1727779950139's avatar u1727780212019's avatar u1727780194928's avatar
Specific threats elicit stronger reactions than vague ones

Personal growth and self-improvement occur offline usually 40%
40%
u1727780269122's avatar u1727779906068's avatar u1727780074475's avatar u1727780148882's avatar u1727780007138's avatar u1727779936939's avatar u1727780228999's avatar u1727780091258's avatar u1727780083070's avatar

Vertical farming needs a lot of electricity 49%
49%
u1727779941318's avatar u1727780148882's avatar u1727780124311's avatar u1727694232757's avatar u1727780282322's avatar u1727779953932's avatar

The model allows for self-service provisioning of services 72%
72%
u1727780078568's avatar u1727780013237's avatar u1727780136284's avatar u1727780091258's avatar

Decentralized governance models use blockchain for decision-making 88%
88%
u1727780136284's avatar u1727780040402's avatar u1727780243224's avatar u1727779950139's avatar u1727780010303's avatar u1727779933357's avatar u1727779923737's avatar u1727780156116's avatar
© CiteBar 2021 - 2025
Home About Contacts Privacy Terms Disclaimer
Please Sign In
Sign in with Google