CiteBar
  • Log in
  • Join

Ordinary evidence is sufficient for ordinary claims 62%

Truth rate: 62%
u1727694221300's avatar u1727780194928's avatar u1727780071003's avatar u1727780027818's avatar u1727780269122's avatar u1727780264632's avatar u1727780243224's avatar
  • Pros: 0
  • Cons: 0
Ordinary evidence is sufficient for ordinary claims

The Power of Ordinary Evidence

In the world of investigation and analysis, it's easy to get caught up in the idea that extraordinary evidence is required to prove or disprove a claim. However, this couldn't be further from the truth. The reality is that ordinary evidence can be more than sufficient to make a case.

What is Ordinary Evidence?

Ordinary evidence refers to the everyday, mundane information that surrounds us. It's the kind of data that we often overlook in favor of looking for something more sensational or extraordinary. However, this type of evidence can be incredibly valuable when it comes to making sense of complex situations or proving a point.

The Problem with Extraordinary Evidence

The pursuit of extraordinary evidence can lead to all sorts of problems. It can distract us from the real issue at hand, causing us to waste time and resources searching for something that may not even exist. Furthermore, it can create unrealistic expectations about what is possible in terms of proof or evidence.

The Value of Ordinary Evidence

Ordinary evidence has several key benefits that make it an invaluable tool in any investigation or analysis. For one thing, it's often more accessible than extraordinary evidence, making it easier to obtain and analyze. Additionally, ordinary evidence can be just as compelling and persuasive as its more sensational counterpart.

  • It's often more readily available
  • It's less prone to bias or manipulation
  • It can provide a more nuanced understanding of the situation

Putting Ordinary Evidence into Practice

So how can we make use of ordinary evidence in our own investigations and analyses? The key is to approach each case with an open mind and a willingness to look at all available information. This might involve talking to witnesses, reviewing documents or records, or conducting other forms of research.

Conclusion

In conclusion, ordinary evidence is often more than sufficient for making claims or proving points. By recognizing the value of this type of evidence, we can avoid wasting time and resources on unrealistic expectations about what is possible in terms of proof or evidence. Instead, we can focus on using everyday data to make sense of complex situations and achieve our goals.


Pros: 0
  • Cons: 0
  • ⬆

Be the first who create Pros!



Cons: 0
  • Pros: 0
  • ⬆

Be the first who create Cons!


Refs: 0

Info:
  • Created by: Leon Kaczmarek
  • Created at: Nov. 14, 2024, 12:40 p.m.
  • ID: 15908

Related:
No empirical evidence supports claims of magic 87%
87%
u1727780299408's avatar u1727779950139's avatar u1727780152956's avatar u1727694232757's avatar u1727779966411's avatar u1727780040402's avatar u1727780273821's avatar u1727780264632's avatar u1727780252228's avatar u1727780247419's avatar u1727780324374's avatar u1727780318336's avatar u1727780309637's avatar
No empirical evidence supports claims of magic

Scientific evidence contradicts claims of energy healing efficacy 88%
88%
u1727779945740's avatar u1727780046881's avatar u1727779941318's avatar u1727780043386's avatar u1727780318336's avatar
Scientific evidence contradicts claims of energy healing efficacy

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence 93%
93%
u1727694210352's avatar u1727780269122's avatar u1727780067004's avatar u1727780186270's avatar u1727780177934's avatar u1727780050568's avatar u1727780152956's avatar u1727780091258's avatar u1727780037478's avatar 8d1cbe55e0bbd6152e2d60aae8b604c6's avatar u1727780314242's avatar u1727780140599's avatar
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence

A lack of evidence makes a claim unlikely to be valid 84%
84%
u1727780314242's avatar u1727780046881's avatar u1727779936939's avatar u1727780100061's avatar u1727780299408's avatar u1727779927933's avatar u1727780031663's avatar u1727780024072's avatar u1727780190317's avatar u1727780020779's avatar u1727780110651's avatar u1727780256632's avatar u1727780103639's avatar
A lack of evidence makes a claim unlikely to be valid

Claims lack scientific evidence for near-death occurrences 59%
59%
u1727780024072's avatar u1727694249540's avatar u1727694244628's avatar u1727780016195's avatar u1727780140599's avatar u1727694221300's avatar u1727780010303's avatar u1727694216278's avatar u1727780219995's avatar u1727779945740's avatar u1727780107584's avatar u1727780282322's avatar
Claims lack scientific evidence for near-death occurrences

Fact-checking involves evaluating evidence to confirm or deny claims 82%
82%
u1727780107584's avatar u1727694239205's avatar u1727780043386's avatar u1727779979407's avatar
Fact-checking involves evaluating evidence to confirm or deny claims

There is no concrete evidence to support some acupuncture claims 69%
69%
u1727780148882's avatar u1727694221300's avatar u1727780136284's avatar u1727780071003's avatar
There is no concrete evidence to support some acupuncture claims

Verbal claims are unsupported by facts or evidence 94%
94%
u1727780347403's avatar u1727780309637's avatar u1727779979407's avatar u1727780091258's avatar u1727780256632's avatar
Verbal claims are unsupported by facts or evidence

Evidence-based analysis reduces the risk of false claims 81%
81%
u1727780342707's avatar u1727780273821's avatar u1727780107584's avatar u1727780002943's avatar u1727780194928's avatar u1727780190317's avatar
Evidence-based analysis reduces the risk of false claims

Streaming quality may vary depending on provider 61%
61%
u1727694221300's avatar u1727779945740's avatar u1727780034519's avatar u1727780148882's avatar
© CiteBar 2021 - 2025
Home About Contacts Privacy Terms Disclaimer
Please Sign In
Sign in with Google