Passive sentences can't be fixed that way ^87%

The Passive Sentence Conundrum: Why Revision Won't Fix It

When I'm reviewing writing samples from students or colleagues, one issue that consistently crops up is the misuse of passive voice. Specifically, when I suggest changing a sentence to make it more active, some people get defensive and insist that their original construction is fine as-is. But here's the thing: revision alone can't salvage a sentence with deep-seated structural problems.

What Makes Passive Sentences Stick

• They create ambiguity
• They hide responsibility
• They lead to awkward phrasing

The Problem with Revision Alone

Revising passive sentences often involves rephrasing them in an active voice. While this might seem like a simple fix, it can also obscure the underlying issue: that the sentence was poorly constructed from the start.

Why Passive Sentences Persist

In many cases, writers rely on passive constructions because they're not sure who performed the action described in the sentence. However, this uncertainty is often a sign of a larger problem – namely, that the writer hasn't taken the time to figure out what's really going on in their story or argument.

The Bigger Picture

Good writing isn't just about stringing together grammatically correct sentences; it's also about creating clear, concise language that serves the reader. Passive sentences can derail even the best-laid plans by introducing ambiguity and obscurity into your text.

Conclusion

If you find yourself struggling with passive voice in your writing, don't be afraid to take a step back and re-examine your sentence structure. While revision is an essential part of the writing process, it's not a magic bullet that can fix all problems at once. By understanding why passive sentences persist – and taking steps to address these underlying issues – you'll produce stronger, more engaging text that resonates with your readers.