Passive sentences can't be fixed that way ^87%

• Main
• Pros
• Cons: 2

The Passive Sentence Conundrum: Why Revision Won't Fix It

When I'm reviewing writing samples from students or colleagues, one issue that consistently crops up is the misuse of passive voice. Specifically, when I suggest changing a sentence to make it more active, some people get defensive and insist that their original construction is fine as-is. But here's the thing: revision alone can't salvage a sentence with deep-seated structural problems.

What Makes Passive Sentences Stick

• They create ambiguity
• They hide responsibility
• They lead to awkward phrasing

The Problem with Revision Alone

Revising passive sentences often involves rephrasing them in an active voice. While this might seem like a simple fix, it can also obscure the underlying issue: that the sentence was poorly constructed from the start.

Why Passive Sentences Persist

In many cases, writers rely on passive constructions because they're not sure who performed the action described in the sentence. However, this uncertainty is often a sign of a larger problem – namely, that the writer hasn't taken the time to figure out what's really going on in their story or argument.

The Bigger Picture

Good writing isn't just about stringing together grammatically correct sentences; it's also about creating clear, concise language that serves the reader. Passive sentences can derail even the best-laid plans by introducing ambiguity and obscurity into your text.

Conclusion

If you find yourself struggling with passive voice in your writing, don't be afraid to take a step back and re-examine your sentence structure. While revision is an essential part of the writing process, it's not a magic bullet that can fix all problems at once. By understanding why passive sentences persist – and taking steps to address these underlying issues – you'll produce stronger, more engaging text that resonates with your readers.

---

Pros

Be the first who create Pros!

---

Cons

Restructuring is required for effective sentence revision ^{69% (-60)}

Active voice is more effective than passive voice ^{32% (-40)}

---

Restructuring is required for effective sentence revision ^69%

Impact:

-60

Restructuring involves making significant changes to a sentence's structure, often requiring the reorganization of its components. This process typically aims to improve clarity and coherence by rearranging elements such as subjects, verbs, and objects. Effective sentence revision through restructuring can lead to more logical and engaging writing. It may also involve adding or removing words, phrases, or clauses to enhance sentence flow and meaning. By doing so, the rewritten sentence can convey intended ideas more effectively than the original.

---

Active voice is more effective than passive voice ^32%

Impact:

-40

Using active voice makes it clear who is performing an action, making the meaning of a sentence easier to understand and more engaging for readers. It also tends to sound more natural and concise compared to passive voice. Passive voice can lead to ambiguity and confusion about who is responsible or performing an action. In contrast, active voice emphasizes the doer of the action, creating a sense of directness and clarity. This results in a more effective communication of ideas.

---

• Created by: Matteo Schulz
• Created at: Nov. 24, 2024, 1:42 p.m.
• ID: 16193

Interactive installations show the potential of software art technology ^85%
85%


---

Some people may experience adverse effects from sound therapy ^78%
78%


---

Valuable content attracts and retains readers ^84%
84%


---

Sensors and data visualization tools can be used to do this ^64%
64%


---

Green buildings promote a healthier indoor environment ^89%
89%


---

Evidence for sound therapy's long-term benefits is limited ^58%
58%


---

The scientific community is skeptical of sound therapy ^81%
81%


---

Algorithms create dynamic interactive experiences easily ^95%
95%


---

Kendama originated in Japan ^88%
88%


---

People don't want to break emotional bonds from owning things ^78%
78%