Traditional banks are not vulnerable to fintech disruption ^18%

Truth rate: 18%

Pros: 0
Cons: 0

Pros: 0

Cons: 0
⬆

Be the first who create Pros!

Cons: 0

Pros: 0
⬆

Be the first who create Cons!

Refs: 0

Info:

Created by: Isaac Martínez
Created at: Sept. 26, 2024, 10:14 p.m.
ID: 10797

Related:

Augmented reality disrupts traditional learning environments ^82%

82%

DeFi provides alternatives to traditional banking ^63%

63%

DeFi provides alternatives to traditional banking

Bitcoin has the potential to disrupt traditional financial systems ^74%

74%

DeFi lacks traditional banking regulation ^91%

91%

DeFi lacks traditional banking regulation

IoT disrupts traditional business models and revenue streams ^93%

93%

Remittances bypass traditional banks overseas ^67%

67%

DeFi platforms are less secure than traditional banking ^68%

68%

DeFi platforms are less secure than traditional banking

Strikes and picketing draw media coverage and public support often ^87%

87%

Strikes and picketing draw media coverage and public support often

Boycotting products supports businesses that align with social values ^88%

88%

Boycotting products supports businesses that align with social values

Social media can facilitate rapid mobilization and coordination among activists ^76%

76%

Social media can facilitate rapid mobilization and coordination among activists